The Chancery Procedure in the Juvenile Court, in The Child, The Clinic, and the Court Essay Example for Free

The Chancery mathematical process in the Juvenile Court, in The Child, The Clinic, and the Court EssayFrom 1899, the juvenile accost has always handle three types of juvenile cases. These cases include tiddler go bad, abuse and other military position offences. Juvenile delinquency cases ar unlawful action that is actioned by the bush league which would therein be crimes if they were partaken by adults. Status offences argon on the other hand non vile offences which are deemed offences if they are affiliated by the minors. The common examples of these lieu offences include running away and truancy. Till 1960s, both noncriminal and criminal fashions were all considered to be forms of delinquents. Hence the law did not differentiate amongst delinquents and status offenders. In neglect and child abuse cases, the speak to lead always provide protection for children who are abuse or neglected. In the division 1994, delinquency cases made up to 64% of the list juvenil e cases in these courts, with status offences making 15% and neglect and abuse cases making 16% of the total national juvenile court cases. I nonplus discussed all these types of these cases below with the verbal description of these court processes that are charterd in the manipulation of these cases along with the current policy issues which are involved. It is worth noting that though these cases seem to be different from individually other, there are almost common themes and values which are applied in handling these cases. The nearly obvious of these is the judges which are handling these cases to note that these children need to be taken care of for their breeding in making legal conclusivenesss making much attention to the legal needs of children along with their families. Secondly, stock-still if the court is one of the institutions that work to the betterment of the families and children, it is posed with a unique and awesome power in delinquency, child abuse cases and the status offences cases. Juvenile court has powers to separate the children from their parents, can also order these minors to live in confined places, also they can end the biological right of relationship between a child and the parent and create for them other new parental rights.As these decisions are deemed to be very serious and fundamental to the well being of children, ensuring these courts possesses adequate resources is very vital as it handles both type of cases. Judges require information, work equal facilities and adequate training so that it can be able to handle these cases in the approximately appropriate manner. Adequate representation of all the involved parties should always be in the court proceedings. All the communities need to imbibe safe, effective program and placements which are available for children attack before the court. As it would be very clear from the subsequent discussion, these courts handle very difficult workloads and involves the n ear emotion laden and very controversial issues in close to parts of the society. Because of this, these decisions have in many cases faced disagreements. The extent to which these cases should be equipped and expanded to equip them with the resources that are required for them to adequately perform their roles has formed basis of many discussions and debates.Lastly, as these courts make decisions which are very vital in the social development, they are most often the subject of the social media and in most cases form the basis for governmental platform. So judges should always have the urge to play leadership roles, both in the agencies which respond children and the broader community so as to encourage thoughtful and deliberative approaches to all these problems, instead of other approaches which are reached hastily.DelinquencyThe juvenile handling of the delinquent case is the one which is always handled by these courts in the normal public perception. When unlawful deeds ar e committed by the minors, these cases are usually brought under these courts as delinquent cases. These cases in most cases include petty theft, misdemeanors, vandalism and also some kind of felonies desire robbery and other aggravated assaults. The maximum age handled by these courts are typically determined by the state laws. In the District of Columbia and other 37 states, the maximum age for this is 17 years of age, in other 10 states it is 16 and in the rest 3 this is set to a maximum of 15 years.Currently these courts have become the centre stage for public concern due to the change magnitude number of crimes and the high rate of juvenile related crimes. Recently these courts have been criticized for their perceived leniency towards their decision on these juvenile delinquents. One of the best examples of this is the inability of these courts failure to impose sentences that go beyond 21 years of age. High visibility and serious hazardous crimes that are committed by min ors have always captured the public interests and attention drawing juvenile offenders dispensement to get tougher on crimes that have been familiar politically for the past twenty years.This public fear of the juvenile court legal power has resulted into some changes in the jurisdiction of the juvenile courts. Since 1992, the executive and the legislative branch in 41 states has hence limited the jurisdiction of the cases that involve chronic offenders, violent and shifted these court cases from their rehabilitative tradition which have involved addressing offenders rather than the offences which has been committed toward a more(prenominal) punitive arranging which is foc utilize on the offence itself. For instance, 14 states in the year 1990 had to amend their codes to clearly list public safety as the sole purpose of the juvenile legal expert system the punishment is listed as either capital or one of the several purposes of the court system in 28 states. The most significa nt thing that has happened since 1992 is that all but 10 states have organize adult courts in a manner that they can be able to handle juvenile cases. In most of the instances when the minors are convicted in the adult courts, it really posses a possibility that the minor whitethorn be sentenced to the prisons instead of being placed in juvenile facilities that offers rehabilitative programs.Even though the violent juvenile cases grab most of the interest and headlines from the media and tend to have the highest influence on the justice system, most of the juvenile courts handle less serious crimes. Mostly, the highest numbers of cases that are handled by most of the juvenile courts involve cases like vandalism, motor vehicle theft in which they mostly belong to their parents and larceny cases. In 1992, guard made a lot of juvenile arrests and contrary to the perception of the public the most serious beef was a property offence charge in the 57% of the total cases. Offences again st persons like assault and robberies comprised of 215 of the total cases, disorder conduct which is a form of public order offence showed to be like 17% of the cases with the 155 being taken by the drug law violation.In spite of the young pack being not disproportionately responsible for the most violent crimes, they always commit more than their constituent of property criminal offences. For instance in the year 1992, the y go forthh aged between 10 to 17 years of age comprised 13 % of the US world and they were responsible for like the same percentage of their population of all the violent crimes which were committed in this year and they were responsible for more than 23% of the property crimes which is more than their proportion portion of their population.Purpose of the researchCurrently it has been more than 100th anniversary of these juvenile court approaches. This paper will provide an insight for the explanation of the cases that are handled by these courts along with t he current trends and issues that have cropped up in these juvenile courts. The main goal of this research paper is to present an apparent description of these courts today and hence address the future challenges along with the recommendations to be adopted. This paper majorly addresses the courts status and their ability to handle these cases along with the improvements that should be adopted for these courts to be able to partake their roles in the most appropriate manner.The research methodologyIn my information collection, I will apply both primary and secondary data methods of data collection.Primary methodsCensus- I will carry out census where I will talk to the many stakeholders and other involved associations and institutions although this method is somehow expensive because of the cost involved.Samples- I will sample out some of the involved people and stakeholdersObservation- I will visit some of the juvenile courts to get the real state on the ground.The secondary sourc es of data collectionQuestionnaires- I will develop many questionnaires which I will use to get the information required to carry out my research.Surveys- through the questionnaires, I will sample out and send some surveys to the stakeholders and these specialized institutions.Books, web, magazines, journals and other online sources- I will use the already available written materials to get complete insights on this topic.In my data outline, I will include the following methods of data analysisContent analyzesThis is the most simple and widely employed method of data analysis. It can be defined as the systematic description of behavior which asks, who? Where and how? And what questions within a formulated set of rules so as to limit the effects of bias in analysis. It could be the most preferred technique which is employed to analyze semi-structured interviews and cognitive interview testing.Narrative analysis- I will employ narrative analysis to analyze data where I will focus on the peoples stories and how they think well-nigh the issue in question. Although I will not treat these stories as the true facts I highly employ them to get how people think and feel about these juvenile courts.3. Grounded TheoryThis is the most standard and classical technique that is employed in analyzing social data. It uses stratified and systematic data set. It develops a set of inductively derived hypothesis that is grounded on the data.TriangulationIn this method of data analysis I will combine both the quantitative and qualitative data analysis to come up with a precise data interpretation.Data presentationIn my data presentation, I will employ many methods which would be very appropriate for this data.Frequency distribution tableIn this method I shall be focusing on the occurrence of a authoritative variable like a certain facility in the juvenile courts according to each state court system.Graphical methodsHere I will try to focus on the relationship of variables in th e court system.ChartsThese will be used to show the extent to which a certain variable has been employed in the courts.ReferencesJulian Mack, The Chancery Procedure in the Juvenile Court, in The Child, The Clinic, and the Court (1925), p. 310.Julian Mack, The Juvenile Court, 23 Harv.L.Rev. 104, 119-120 (1909).Shears, Legal Problems Peculiar to Childrens Courts, 48 A.B.A.J. 719, 720 (1962)January 2007 publication, Californias Criminal Justice system.Vitaly Friedman (2008) Data visual percept and Infographics in Graphics, Monday Inspiration, January 14th, 2008.Lengler, Ralph Lengler, Ralph. Periodic Table of Visualization MethodsSource document