Plato- The Republic

Though Socrates himself admits some failure in his attempt to sit justice , the argument he has with Thrasymachus in the first stimulate of Plato s Republic demonstrates the superiority of Socrates over Thrasymachus as a com flow point . Yet , the comparative nature of the limit superior leads to a spot where , though Socrates argument may not pass on been inf everyible , it proves unassail adequate by that which was presented by Thrasymachus . Socrates achieves close to consummate success in def go throughing Thrasymachus argument , and in so doing achieves a lower-level of success in defining the term justice , as he had set out to do . The success that Socrates finds is so relative , and contingent on the circumstance that where Thrasymachus was content derive and argue in the abstract , Socrates make his arguments more than concrete by substituting proper(postnominal) cases . The specificity of Socrates arguments has the avail of revealing the flaws native in the reasoning put frontwards by Thrasymachus , and in that sense Socrates argument against him is successfulThrasymachus enters an argument begun by Socrates and Polemarchus by pick at their dialectic efforts and asserting his pretend claim that justice is equal solely in the pastime of the stronger entity This claim is a deterministic 1 that identifies the ability to cross with the right to de partd what sensation desires from that which has been subdued . Yet , the awkward and imprecise way in which it is phrased leaves Thrasymachus open to interpretations which he has not mean Socrates is immediately able to counteract this argument by exemplify it in the real-life situation of the pancratiast (wrestler ) whose need for strength requires that he exhaust beef (338 d . Socrates extension of Thrasymachus argument sh ows that it would require that all men eat b! eef regardless of their need for it exclusively because a stronger man necessity for the commodity dictates this . Thrasymachus cannot admit this specific treatment of the social function to be true , and is indeed forced to modify his direction .

He says , That s abominable of you , Socrates you borrow hold of the argument in the way you can wreak it the most harm (338 e describing the method through which Socrates is able to confound his argument . In disproving an argument or either possible action , Socrates knows that one has save to find one special case in which the theory does not afford . He uses this knowledge to his advantage in succeeding against Thrasymachus , who should live with detected these areas of inconsistency on his own before presenting his argumentPlato by and by presents a second area in which Socrates is successful in his argument against Thrasymachus . Thrasymachus argues a trifle more specifically when he speaks of the different types of government and how each rules by making and enforcing laws . He emphasizes the standardisedity of their methods while acknowledging a battle in the types of government that offspring - yet without any evoke as to what might discombobulate caused such differing outcomes from such similar methods . Socrates pounces upon this weakness by embarking on a dialectical tour toward discovering precisely what...If you want to name a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper